Keyword Search: Insurance
SJC-10715: ANAWAN INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. & another vs. DIVISION OF INSURANCE
Argument: September 2010
Keywords: Consumer Protection - Insurance - Statute of Limitations
Question Presented: Whether a government consumer protection action “accrues” when the violation occurs, or when the government has reason to know of it.
Facts: Anawan Insurance Agency paid commissions to a broker from 1997 to 2001, even though the broker’s license had expired early in the relationship. The Massachusetts Division of Insurance discovered …
SJC-10673: MASSACHUSETTS INSURERS INSOLVENCY FUND vs. RICHARD SMITH & others
Argument: September 2010
Keywords: Contract Law - Insurance
Question Presented: Whether the Massachusetts Insurers Insolvency Fund cap of $300,000 per claim applies to each claimant, or may apply in the aggregate to all claims arising from a single incident if specified by the policy.
Facts: After a doctor allegedly provided negligent care to Richard Smith, Smith and his wife and two children filed tort claims for bodily injury and loss of consortium. The doctor’s …
SJC-10652: MASSACHUSETTS CARE SELF-INSURANCE GROUP, INC. vs. MASSACHUSETTS INSURERS INSOLVENCY FUND
Argument: September 2010
Keywords: Disabilities - Employment - Insurance
Question Presented: Whether a workers’ compensation self-insurance group qualifies for payments from the Massachusetts Insurers Insolvency Fund when its excess insurer is insolvent.
Facts: The Massachusetts Care Self-Insurance Group (“MCSIG”) is a self-insurance pool of nursing home care businesses, designed to meet the member businesses’ duties under the Workers Compensation Act. As of 1995 …
SJC-10656: GEORGE H. BILLINGS vs. COMMERCE INSURANCE COMPANY
Argument: September 2010
Keywords: Insurance - Malicious Prosecution
Question Presented: Whether the tort of malicious prosecution occurs, for insurance and indemnity purposes, on the date the malicious lawsuit is filed, or on the date it is terminated in the defendant’s favor.
Facts: In 1998, the plaintiff, Billings, sued the Petersons over a proposed wetlands development. The case was dismissed in April 2000 as a result of an earlier settlement. In March 2000 …